| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Pizza Serpent Rider

Joined: 12 May 2009 Posts: 4
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Robinson Site Admin


Joined: 12 Mar 2002 Posts: 4184
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think Six Flags has taken everything it wants out of the park, the Batman: The Ride and didn't the S&S towers go also?
Fact is Six Flags certainly can't afford to reopen the park, the couldn't even afford the park when they purchased the lease.
I don't think anything the courts say will make much of a difference. Six Flags is going to go into Chapter 11 and NOLA is going to get pennies on the dollar for what they could have gotten by taking the original offer.
I really think the park is gone. Six Flags, under Burkes "Leadership" costs us both Parks.
Makes we want to say:
Dear Six Flags,
Remember us?
Sincerely,
The Gulf Coast. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wiyoh20 Greezed Lightnin' Rider


Joined: 22 Dec 2007 Posts: 278 Location: Baton Rouge, LA
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Mayor is just simply wasting taxpayer dollars. That park will NOT re-open! Being that the park was pretty much totaled, you would be basically be building a new park. No one wants to have thier fingers in that park, except Danny Rogers. I know I am preaching to the choir on this one, but I would see where maybe a tenative 5 or 10 year lease would have been more whats the word? Practical! Than a 75 year lease, that was !@#$%^&* insane! I don't know what on this earth was going on in Burke's mind during his reign of Six Flags, making good, sound, business decisions was NOT one of his strong points. _________________ If Astroworld can't make you happy, you can't get happy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Robinson Site Admin


Joined: 12 Mar 2002 Posts: 4184
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wiyoh20 wrote: | | I know I am preaching to the choir on this one, but I would see where maybe a tenative 5 or 10 year lease would have been more whats the word? Practical! Than a 75 year lease, that was !@#$%^&* insane! I don't know what on this earth was going on in Burke's mind during his reign of Six Flags, making good, sound, business decisions was NOT one of his strong points. |
Yeah, its a shame the Six Flags did not turn out to be the "Prince" that some people wanted...
A bunch of us knew it was a cluster from the very start, regardless of the Hurricane, Six Flags was in way too much debt to manage the park. At least the current CEO, Mr. Shapiro agrees with us! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wiyoh20 Greezed Lightnin' Rider


Joined: 22 Dec 2007 Posts: 278 Location: Baton Rouge, LA
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, the City really has nothing left to stand on, they screwed themselves by not taking a decent offer a couple years ago. Chapter 11 actually will be the best route to get that park out of the Six Flags portfolio and off of the map once and for all. _________________ If Astroworld can't make you happy, you can't get happy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pizza Serpent Rider

Joined: 12 May 2009 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The city isn't planning on reopening the park. They just want to get Six Flags out of the way so that they can develop something on the property, it isn't doing anything by sitting there. Three possible developments would be a sports complex (IMO, stupid idea), Danny Roger's idea, and a waterpark (IMO, the best idea). The waterpark would not be the one Danny Rogers is wanting to build along with the themepark, it's something totally different, just a waterpark. I think economically it would do the best, it would be cheaper to build than refubishing the themepark, and it is probably in the best interest of the residents of N.O. and surrounding areas since it's so hot and humid. We have Blue Bayou but it is a little farther away than the SFNO property. So whenever the city gains control of the land, IMO, should build a waterpark. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Robinson Site Admin


Joined: 12 Mar 2002 Posts: 4184
|
Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think a Waterpark would be great and would work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ThatTh*ngGirl Texas Cyclone Rider

Joined: 17 Jul 2002 Posts: 3029 Location: In the Mr. Freeze Driver's Box
|
Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Pizza wrote: | | The city isn't planning on reopening the park. They just want to get Six Flags out of the way so that they can develop something on the property.. |
If the city wanted Six Flags out of the way, they wouldn't be taking the corporation to court over a settlement for a lease that the city could just as easily release Six Flags from. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ThatTh*ngGirl Texas Cyclone Rider

Joined: 17 Jul 2002 Posts: 3029 Location: In the Mr. Freeze Driver's Box
|
Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
You can't fix stupid..
Although the reader comments (only 2 at this time) are hil-larious.
http://www.nola.com/business/index.ssf/2009/05/city_granted_temporary_restrai.html
City granted temporary restraining order against Six Flags
by The Times-Picayune
Tuesday May 12, 2009, 1:28 PM
The city of New Orleans received a temporary restraining order against theme park operator Six Flags today, one day after a deadline set by the city for the company to resolve a dispute regarding its defunct amusement park expired.
The temporary restraining order prohibits Six Flags from "removing any exhibits, rides or other assets at the site," City Attorney Pena Moses-Fields said.
Negotiations between City Hall and the theme park operator broke down last month after the embattled company restated that it would not reopen its eastern New Orleans theme park or pay the city to back out of its lease.
A hearing will be held on the matter May 26 at civil district court in New Orleans.
I'm under the impression Six Flags doesn't own any of this stuff anyway, and what actually DOES belong has long since been removed.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wiyoh20 Greezed Lightnin' Rider


Joined: 22 Dec 2007 Posts: 278 Location: Baton Rouge, LA
|
Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bottom line the city is still on the hook for thier bad investment. It is NOT Six Flag's fault the park was built in the swamp near the 9th ward. Granted that Katrina did not devistate the park then we would have a park still up and running. Or if Six Flags had the money to rebuild the park they may have. You cannot expect someone that is 2+ BILLION in the hole to be able to handle the task that is at hand.
You most certainly cannot fix stupid I agree. You cannot expect the same offer you were given two years ago to still stand, just a little too late now.
Sad thing is that is just a perfect example of our fine leadership in the City.  _________________ If Astroworld can't make you happy, you can't get happy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ThatTh*ngGirl Texas Cyclone Rider

Joined: 17 Jul 2002 Posts: 3029 Location: In the Mr. Freeze Driver's Box
|
Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
The transaction itself was poor all around. Six Flags may not have built the park, but they sure did figure it was worth a good financial rescue.
Did you know about Ray Nagin coming thisclose to foreclosure on his little condo located in my area, which is where he stayed in Katrina's aftermath? So close to foreclosure it made the news, though some last-second deal was made. Fine example of someone who is leading NOLA to this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|